Independent Information Portal — Not an Official Government or GMADA Website.Read full disclaimer
GREATER MOHALI REGION — Independent Information Portal|Latest:Public notice regarding village manak majra, naanu majra, Sohana, Sabhaalki.NEW
Ad — Below Header — Leaderboard 728×90 (publisher ID not set)

GMADA Public Notice

Notice regarding petition for special leave petition(Civil) no 5720 of 2016..

PublishedSep 2025
FormatPDF
Size432.48 KB
LanguageEnglish
Open Original Document on gmada.gov.in

Overview of the Notice

A notice has been issued by the Supreme Court of India in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 5720 of 2016, titled Estate Officer, GMADA and another vs. Kulwinder Singh and others. The notice concerns respondents from Chandigarh and SAS Nagar (Mohali), Punjab. The Court record states that the show-cause notice could not be served on Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 7 to 10. Because the normal service of notice could not be completed, the Supreme Court allowed an application for paper publication so that the concerned respondents could be informed about the proceedings.

Who Is Named in the Notice?

The published notice is addressed to six respondents: Kulwinder Singh, son of Avtar Singh, resident of Village Atawa, Chandigarh. Harcharan Singh, son of Avtar Singh, resident of Village Atawa, Chandigarh. Amrik Singh, son of Chet Singh, resident of Kumbra, SAS Nagar, Punjab. Jeet Singh, son of Chet Singh, resident of Kumbra, SAS Nagar, Punjab. Bal Bir Singh, son of Joginder Singh, resident of Kumbra, SAS Nagar, Punjab. Balwinder Singh, son of Joginder Singh, resident of Kumbra, SAS Nagar, Punjab. The notice identifies these persons as respondents in SLP (Civil) No. 5720 of 2016.

Why Was the Notice Published?

The case was earlier listed before the Supreme Court on 14 December 2018 along with other connected matters. The Court had directed that notice be issued and that the matter be listed again after the required period. However, the show-cause notice could not be served on Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 7 to 10. The matter was therefore placed before the Registrar's Court on 14 July 2025. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to publish the notice in a newspaper for the unserved respondents. The Registrar allowed the application and granted four weeks to file proof of publication.

What Did the Registrar's Court Record?

The order dated 14 July 2025 also records that:

  • Respondent Nos. 3–6, 12 and 15 had filed their counter affidavits.
  • The opportunity given to Respondent Nos. 16–18 to file counter affidavits had already been declined.
  • The petitioner had informed the Registry about a change of counsel, and the Registry was directed to update its records.
  • Service was complete on the remaining respondents, although none had entered appearance.
  • The matter was directed to be listed again on 20 August 2025.

What Does the Notice Ask the Respondents to Do?

The notice gives the concerned respondents an opportunity to appear before the Supreme Court. They may appear personally or through an Advocate-on-Record duly appointed for the case. The notice states that appearance should be made within 30 days from the date of service of the notice. The respondents may then show cause before the Court as to why the special leave and interim relief sought in the petition should not be granted and why the resulting appeal should not be allowed.

What About the Interim Order?

The notice states that the petitioner's request for interim relief after notice will also be considered by the Court in due course. It further records that an interim order has already been passed in the SLP after notice. The scanned notice does not reproduce the full terms of that interim order. Therefore, its exact effect should be checked from the relevant Supreme Court order rather than assumed from this notice.

What Happens If Someone Does Not Appear?

The notice contains an important warning. If a concerned respondent does not enter appearance as required, no further notice may be given even after special leave is granted for hearing of the resultant appeal. The matter may then be disposed of in the respondent's absence. For this reason, anyone named in the notice should take the publication seriously and check the complete case record.

Geographical Context

The notice does not specify a land parcel or village but broadly concerns legal matters affecting the Greater Mohali area, including SAS Nagar district. These issues may involve land, infrastructure, or development schemes within this jurisdiction. The region hosts projects such as the IT City Scheme and various real estate developments overseen by GMADA. The legal disputes referenced could relate to land acquisition processes around SAS Nagar or disputes linked to infrastructure projects vital for the area’s expansion. Such proceedings might influence development activities across multiple sectors within Greater Mohali's planning areas.

Ad — Mid-Article — In-Article Native (publisher ID not set)

Historical and Developmental Background

This petition stems from civil disputes filed in 2016 during a period of active urban development by GMADA, notably the IT City Scheme in SAS Nagar. Over the years, legal challenges related to this petition have involved issues like land ownership rights, delays in infrastructure delivery, and disputes over scheme implementation. These conflicts have sometimes slowed or complicated ongoing real estate and development projects across Greater Mohali. Notices issued in 2016 marked the start of a lengthy legal process, which has extended into 2025 and 2026. These repeated challenges highlight the difficulties GMADA faces in balancing development goals with landowner rights and legal protections, shaping the region’s growth.

Relevance to GMADA’s Development Goals

The legal proceedings connected to this petition are important for GMADA’s development plans. They impact initiatives related to urban expansion, infrastructure modernization, and land use planning. Resolving these disputes is key for progress on flagship projects like the IT City Scheme and other development zones within SAS Nagar. The Supreme Court order dated 16.06.2026, mentioned in the notice, could influence case outcomes and future redevelopment strategies. Clear legal resolutions support investor confidence and facilitate scheme implementation, which are essential for GMADA’s goal to position Mohali as a leading tech and smart city. The notice highlights the importance of legal transparency for the region’s ongoing growth.

Important Details and Next Steps

  • Notice Date: September 16, 2025

For more information and complete details, click on “Open Original Document” to view the official source.



Ad — End of Article — In-Article Native (publisher ID not set)
Where this comes from: This is a summary of a notice published by GMADA. The original document lives on GMADA's own website — gmada.gov.in — use the download button above to view or save it.
Ad — Above Footer — Leaderboard 728×90 (publisher ID not set)