Tentative List of Purab Premium Apartment 550 Flats - Objections/Corrections to be intimated by the applicant to GMADA .

Overview

The document contains a detailed application-status list with: 313 applications divided into: Type 3 – 126 applications Type 2 – 98 applications Type 1 – 89 applications Each record contains fields such as application number, receiving mode, applicant name, father/husband name, category, General/SC classification, Type 1/2/3, amount and status.

Important Limitation

The supplied document begins directly with the application table. It does not identify: the name of the scheme, the project/location, number of properties available, draw date, allotment criteria, or whether this was a final eligibility/result list. Therefore, this page should not yet be titled with the name of any specific GMADA project unless the related brochure, notice or cover page confirms it.

How Many Applications Are in Each Type?

The 313 records break down as follows: Type 3: 126 Type 2: 98 Type 1: 89 The Type 3 section begins with applicants such as Resham Singh and Kamaljeet Singh, with the source recording ₹10,10,000 against the early offline entries. The Type 2 entries begin at serial no. 127, where the recorded amount is ₹8,00,000 for the initial offline applications. The Type 1 entries begin at serial no. 225, with ₹5,40,000 shown against the initial offline applications.

Four Different Statuses Appear

The list uses four different status labels. Success – 116 applications Reconciled – 112 applications EMD Paid – 35 applications Remitted – 50 applications These four groups together account for all 313 entries.

What Does “Success” Mean Here?

The word: Success appears against 116 applications. However, users should be careful not to interpret this automatically as: “successful allottee.” The document does not contain a plot number, flat number, draw result or allotment result against these entries. For example, the first several offline Type 3 applications are simply marked “Success” in the status column. Based on the structure of the document, “Success” appears more likely to describe the application's/payment's recorded processing status. A separate draw or allotment result would be needed before describing these applicants as successful allottees.

What Does “Reconciled” Mean?

All: 112 online applications in this list are marked: Reconciled For example, online Type 3 applications including Balbir Singh, Amita Gupta and Rajiv Prashad are recorded with this status. “Reconciled” should therefore be reproduced exactly as the source status. It should not be converted into: allotted, selected, or successful in draw without another official document.

What Does “EMD Paid” Mean?

The document contains: 35 applications received in: Physical mode with the status: EMD Paid For example, Type 3 physical applications begin with Manjit Kaur Cheema, Manoj Gupta and Kamal Dhingra, each shown as having EMD paid. This confirms that the required amount/EMD was recorded as paid. It does not by itself confirm final allotment.

What Does “Remitted” Mean?

The document contains: 50 applications with status: Remitted Most of these were received through: Bank while a small number of offline applications are also marked Remitted. For example, Type 3 bank applications including Purushotam Kumar, Raj Rani and Raman Kant Mishra carry the status “Remitted.” Again, “Remitted” is a payment/application status, not evidence in this document of property allotment.

Application Receiving Modes

Across the complete list, the application receiving modes are: Offline – 122 Online – 112 Bank – 44 Physical – 35 The status pattern is quite clear: Offline applications are mainly marked Success, with a few marked Remitted. Online applications are marked Reconciled. Physical applications are marked EMD Paid. Bank applications are marked Remitted.

Amounts Recorded for Type 3

Two amounts appear against Type 3 applications: ₹10,10,000 and: ₹10,11,000 The source contains: 87 Type 3 records at ₹10,10,000 and: 39 Type 3 records at ₹10,11,000 Online Type 3 entries generally show ₹10,11,000; for example the online applications beginning at serial no. 49 carry ₹10,11,000.

Amounts Recorded for Type 2

The Type 2 section contains amounts of: ₹8,00,000 and: ₹8,01,000 Across the file: 50 entries show ₹8,00,000 and: 48 entries show ₹8,01,000 For example, initial offline Type 2 applications show ₹8 lakh, while online Type 2 entries such as Lal Singh show ₹8.01 lakh.

Amounts Recorded for Type 1

The Type 1 section similarly contains: ₹5,40,000 and: ₹5,41,000 The file contains: 58 Type 1 entries at ₹5,40,000 and: 31 Type 1 entries at ₹5,41,000 The initial offline Type 1 applicants show ₹5.40 lakh, while online Type 1 applications generally show ₹5.41 lakh.

Why Is There a ₹1,000 Difference?

The document itself does not explain why some applications carry an amount ₹1,000 higher. Therefore, gmada.in should not automatically describe the extra ₹1,000 as: processing fee, online fee, portal charge, or any other specific charge. That explanation requires the scheme brochure or official payment conditions. This caution is particularly important because a few non-online records also show the higher amount.

Categories Included in the List

The document contains applicants from both: General and: Scheduled Caste (SC) categories. It also contains more specific applicant classifications such as: Government Employees, Defence and Paramilitary Forces, General including NRI/PIO/OCI, medal winners in specified international sporting events / Everest mountaineers, and a disabled-person category. For example, the online Type 3 section includes Government Employee, General, Scheduled Caste and Defence/Paramilitary category entries. The Type 2 section also includes an entry under a disabled-person category.

Do These Categories Tell Us the Reservation Quota?

No. The list gives category descriptions against individual applicants, but it does not provide: total reserved units, category-wise quota, draw ratio, priority order, or number of properties available. Those figures should not be calculated from this application list alone.

Some Applicants Appear in More Than One Type

The list also shows that the same or related applicant names can appear under different property types. For example, names such as Gitika Maingi and Prem Lata Goyal appear in more than one type section. Therefore: 313 applications does not necessarily mean 313 unique individuals. It is safer to describe the figure as: 313 application records rather than 313 applicants.

Can a Person Search Their Application?

Yes. The most useful identifiers in this document are: Application Number and: Applicant Name Users should preferably search by application number because names can be repeated or spelled differently. For online applications, the application numbers generally use a format such as: PA402… while older/offline/physical/bank records often use shorter numerical application numbers.

What Should an Applicant Check?

If a person's name appears in the list, they should verify: application number, receiving mode, name spelling, father/husband name, category, Type 1/2/3, recorded amount, and status. A name appearing on the sheet does not by itself answer whether a unit was ultimately allotted.

Does “EMD Paid” Guarantee Participation in a Draw?

Not from this document alone. It confirms only the status shown in this particular list. Final eligibility could potentially depend on other conditions contained in the original scheme, such as: document verification, category eligibility, payment reconciliation, or other application requirements. The relevant brochure/result notice would be needed to determine that.

Does “Reconciled” Mean the Applicant Has Been Selected?

No such conclusion can be drawn from this document. “Reconciled” is the status recorded against online applications. It should not be converted into “selected” or “allotted.”

Does This File Contain Property Numbers?

No. The uploaded list does not contain: flat number, plot number, tower number, sector, property location, or allotment number. This is another reason it should not be presented as a final allotment list.

Does the File Contain a Draw Result?

No draw-result column is visible. There is no field showing: successful draw number, unit allotted, reserve/waiting list, draw rank, or allotment date. Therefore, the safest description is: Application / Payment Status List rather than: Allotment Result

In Simple Words

The document contains: 313 application records across three types. Type 3 has 126 applications. Type 2 has 98 applications. Type 1 has 89 applications. The status column records: 116 Success 112 Reconciled 35 EMD Paid 50 Remitted But these words should not be confused with a final property allotment. The file does not show which plot, flat or other property—if any—was allotted to an applicant.

Suggested gmada.in Classification

Until the related scheme is identified, the safest classification is: Property / Estate Matters → Application Status Lists Suggested status: Application / Payment Status List – 313 Records Once the original brochure or accompanying notice is available, this page can be moved under the exact project/scheme.

Important Note for Publication

Do not currently use a headline such as: “313 Successful Allottees” or: “GMADA Draw Result for 313 Applicants” because the supplied document does not support either statement. The technically accurate description is: a 313-entry application-status list containing Type 1, Type 2 and Type 3 applications with statuses including Success, Reconciled, EMD Paid and Remitted. The project/scheme name should be added only after it is confirmed from the associated official notice or brochure. For complete and authoritative information, click “Open Original Document” to view the official source in full.