Public notice regarding Shri Rajinder Pal S/O Sukhcharan Singh application no 11338.

Overview of the Notice

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) issued an office order regarding a 150 sq. yd. plot connected with: Application No. 11338 The applicant/allottee named in the order is: Rajinder Pal Singh son of Sukhcharan Singh GMADA states that a Letter of Intent had earlier been issued in his favour, but the required payment under the LOI was not deposited within the prescribed period.

Plot Size

The order concerns a: 150 sq. yd. plot The supplied copy does not clearly identify the sector or exact plot number. Those details should therefore not be guessed.

Letter of Intent

GMADA states that the Letter of Intent was issued through: Letter No. 9065 dated: 26 March 2001

How Much Was Required to Be Paid?

Under Condition No. 4 of the LOI, the allottee was required to deposit: 15% of the stated price amounting to: ₹75,375

Original Payment Deadline

The required amount had to be deposited within: 60 days from the date of issue of the LOI

Could the Deadline Be Extended?

Yes. The quoted LOI condition states that the 60-day period could be extended by another: 30 days on the allottee's request. Such extension was subject to interest at: 2% per month calculated on a daily basis for the period of delay beyond the original 60 days.

How Was Payment to Be Made?

The LOI condition stated that payment was to be made through a: crossed bank draft in favour of: Estate Officer, GMADA, S.A.S. Nagar payable at: S.A.S. Nagar

What Did GMADA Find?

According to the cancellation order, the required: ₹75,375 was not deposited with GMADA within the prescribed period. GMADA therefore treated this as a breach of the terms of the Letter of Intent and the applicable allotment policy.

Was the Allottee Given Another Opportunity?

Yes. The order states that GMADA subsequently issued a: public notice giving the allottee an opportunity to present his case. However, according to the order: no letter, application or representation was received from the allottee. This is important because the cancellation order records that an opportunity had been provided before the final adverse action was taken.

What Did GMADA Finally Order?

GMADA ordered: cancellation of the plot allocation/allotment and also ordered that the: EMD / earnest money already deposited be: forfeited in favour of GMADA.

Is This Only a Proposed Cancellation?

No. Unlike some GMADA notices where cancellation is merely “under consideration,” this document contains a final cancellation direction. The correct status is therefore: Allotment / Allocation Cancelled not: Proposed Cancellation or: Show-Cause Notice

What Is the Difference From a Show-Cause Notice?

A show-cause or pre-cancellation notice normally gives the allottee one final opportunity before GMADA takes a decision. Here, that opportunity had already been given through an earlier public notice. The present document records that no response was received and then states that the: allocation/allotment is cancelled and the earnest money forfeited. That makes this a substantially later stage.

Practical Detail: What Should the Allottee Check First?

If the affected person or legal heir is reviewing this old case, the most important records to obtain are:

• original Application No. 11338;
• LOI No. 9065 dated 26 March 2001;
• proof of any payments made;
• bank draft records;
• GMADA ledger/account statement;
• earlier public notice;
• proof of any representation submitted;
• this cancellation order; and
• any subsequent appeal, restoration or review order.

What If the ₹75,375 Was Actually Paid?

If the allottee maintains that the amount had in fact been deposited, documentary proof would be critical. Useful records could include:

• original bank draft counterfoil;
• bank statement;
• bank certificate;
• GMADA receipt;
• challan;
• acknowledgement;
• correspondence with Estate Office; or
• any historical ledger entry.

The cancellation order itself says GMADA had no record of the required payment and had received no response to the earlier opportunity.

What If a Payment Was Made Late?

The original LOI apparently allowed a limited extension of: 30 additional days subject to interest at 2% per month for the delayed period. Therefore, merely showing that money was paid at some later point would not automatically establish compliance. The exact:

• payment date;
• amount;
• extension request;
• interest paid; and
• GMADA acceptance

would all matter.

What Happens to the Earnest Money?

The order expressly directs that the: EMD / earnest money be forfeited in favour of GMADA. The supplied order does not state the exact amount of that EMD. Therefore, the forfeited amount should not be guessed.

Does Cancellation Mean the Applicant Still Owns the Plot?

Based on this order, the allocation/allotment was cancelled. Therefore, the applicant should not be described as continuing to hold a valid allotment unless a later official order:

• restored the allotment;
• set aside the cancellation;
• allowed an appeal/review; or
• issued a fresh allotment.

Could There Be a Later Restoration?

Possibly, but this document does not say so. Old GMADA matters can sometimes have later:

• appeal orders;
• restoration orders;
• policy-based relief;
• amnesty benefits; or
• court directions.

But none of those can be assumed from this cancellation order. For gmada.in, the safest wording is: “The allotment was cancelled through this order. Any later restoration, if granted, would require a separate official record.”

What Should a Buyer or Third Party Check?

If this old allotment appears in a property chain, a buyer should not rely only on the original LOI. The buyer should check:

• whether the cancellation remained in force;
• whether it was challenged;
• whether GMADA restored the allotment;
• whether a final allotment letter was ever issued;
• whether possession was ever handed over; and
• whether a conveyance deed was ever executed.

An LOI issued in 2001 does not by itself prove a continuing title after a later cancellation order.

Does This Order Identify the Exact Plot?

The supplied copy clearly gives:

• 150 sq. yd. category;
• Application No. 11338;
• allottee name;
• LOI number and date; and
• payment default.

However, the exact: sector and plot number are not clearly visible in the supplied text. They should not be added without the original property record.

In Simple Words

Rajinder Pal Singh had applied for a: 150 sq. yd. plot and GMADA issued an LOI on: 26 March 2001 The LOI required him to deposit: ₹75,375 within: 60 days with a possible limited 30-day extension subject to interest. According to GMADA, the required amount was not deposited within the prescribed period. GMADA later gave the allottee another opportunity through a public notice, but states that no representation or payment proof was received. GMADA therefore finally ordered: cancellation of the plot allocation/allotment and: forfeiture of the EMD/earnest money.

Order Reference

The supplied copies show: DPR/Pb/35298 and: NA/12/23875/2023/35298 The exact internal office-order number/date is not clearly readable in the supplied OCR and should be verified from the original scan before being used as permanent metadata.

Issuing Authority

Estate Officer (Plots) GMADA, S.A.S. Nagar

Suggested gmada.in Classification

Property / Estate Matters → Plot Allotment → Payment Default → Cancellation Order Suggested status: Allotment Cancelled – EMD Forfeited Useful tags: 150 Sq. Yd. Plot · LOI Default · ₹75,375 Payment · Allotment Cancellation · EMD Forfeiture

Practical Takeaway

The key difference for users is: This is not a warning that cancellation may happen. The document records that GMADA actually cancelled the allotment after the required payment was not found in its records and no response was received to the earlier public notice. Anyone relying on this old allotment should therefore look for a later restoration, appeal or court order before treating the allotment as valid.

Important Note

gmada.in should not state that the plot was later re-allotted, restored or transferred unless a separate official record confirms it. Similarly, the exact plot number, sector and forfeited EMD amount should not be inferred from this OCR copy. For complete and authoritative information, click “Open Original Document” to view the official source in full.