Independent Information Portal — Not an Official Government or GMADA Website.Read full disclaimer
GREATER MOHALI REGION — Independent Information Portal|Latest:Public notice regarding village manak majra, naanu majra, Sohana, Sabhaalki.NEW
Ad — Below Header — Leaderboard 728×90 (publisher ID not set)

GMADA Public Notice

Public notice regarding sector 74 SAS Nagar national highway 21.

PublishedDec 2024
FormatPDF
Size599.28 KB
LanguageEnglish
Open Original Document on gmada.gov.in

What the available notice information establishes

The Land Acquisition Collector, Urban Development Department, Punjab issued a public notice regarding acquisition of a missing Khasra number required for the: 200-foot-wide PR-7 Road from Sector 74 to Kharar National Highway No. 21, S.A.S. Nagar The land area mentioned in the notice is: 4 Kanal 8 Marla

What Is the Acquisition About?

The notice states that a land parcel described as a: Missing Khasra Number was being acquired in connection with the already constructed/planned PR-7 road corridor running from: Sector 74 to: Kharar National Highway No. 21 The notice does not provide the exact Khasra number in the supplied copy.

Section 11 Notification

According to the notice, the Punjab Government, Housing and Urban Development Department had already issued a preliminary acquisition notification under: Section 11 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 on: 9 September 2024 This means the acquisition had already entered the formal preliminary-notification stage before the present R&R hearing notice was issued.

Why Was This Hearing Being Held?

The notice states that, under: Section 16(5) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 the landowners and affected families were to be given an opportunity to present their views. Section 16 relates to preparation of the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme for affected families.

Who Was to Conduct the Hearing?

The hearing was to be conducted by the: Administrator (R&R)-cum-Additional Deputy Commissioner (General), Mohali

Hearing Date

7 January 2025

Time

11:00 AM

Venue

The hearing was scheduled in the office room of the: Administrator (R&R)-cum-Additional Deputy Commissioner (General), Mohali at: District Administrative Complex, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali

Who Could Present Their Views?

The notice specifically refers to:

  • landowners; and
  • affected families

connected with the land being acquired. They could present their views regarding the acquisition-related Rehabilitation and Resettlement process on the scheduled date.

What Does Section 16(5) Mean?

Section 16(5) forms part of the statutory process for preparing the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme. At this stage, affected families may raise issues concerning matters such as:

  • Rehabilitation and Resettlement benefits;
  • livelihood impact;
  • structures or assets affected;
  • displacement-related concerns;
  • omissions in the draft R&R record; and
  • other issues relevant to their entitlement.

This should not be confused with a Section 15 objection hearing, which relates to objections against the proposed acquisition after the Section 11 notification.

Is This a Compensation Award Hearing?

No. This notice does not announce an acquisition award. It does not state:

  • final market value;
  • compensation payable;
  • award number;
  • award date;
  • compensation payment status; or
  • possession status.

Those matters belong to later stages of the acquisition process.

Does This Mean the Missing Khasra Had Already Been Finally Acquired?

No. The notice shows that acquisition proceedings were underway and had reached the Rehabilitation and Resettlement hearing stage. It does not by itself establish that:

  • the Section 19 declaration had been issued;
  • the final award had been announced;
  • compensation had been paid; or
  • possession had been taken.

What Happens After Section 16(5)?

After hearing affected families, the R&R Scheme can move through further review and approval. The broader process may then continue through stages such as: R&R Scheme finalisation → Section 18 approval → Section 19 declaration → claims and measurement → award → compensation → possession Each stage requires separate official documentation.

What Should Affected Landowners Check?

Affected persons should verify:

  • the exact missing Khasra number;
  • ownership/share in the revenue record;
  • exact area affected;
  • Section 11 notification dated 9 September 2024;
  • R&R records;
  • proceedings of the 7 January 2025 hearing;
  • subsequent Section 18 approval;
  • Section 19 declaration, if issued;
  • award and compensation records; and
  • possession status.

Related Later Record

A later record concerning this same missing Khasra acquisition for the PR-7 road shows that approval under Section 18 of the RFCTLARR Act was subsequently granted by the office of the Commissioner, Rupnagar Division. That later approval is a separate legal stage and should be cross-linked rather than merged with this Section 16(5) hearing notice.

What the place references do and do not establish

The December notice is associated with Sector 74, SAS Nagar, and National Highway 21. A separate notice tracked on this site, published in February 2025, refers to a 200-wide PR-7 road from Sector 74 to Kharar National Highway 21, in tehsil Mohali, district SAS Nagar. That later record gives a more specific corridor description, but does not establish that the December notice concerns the same alignment or land.

The available information does not identify villages, khasra numbers, boundaries, or other location markers for the December notice. The later notice’s tehsil and district references do not confirm the earlier notice’s exact jurisdiction or affected area.

Reading the place references

For the December notice, the established location references are Sector 74, SAS Nagar, and National Highway 21. The February 2025 title adds a route from Sector 74 to Kharar National Highway 21 and identifies tehsil Mohali and district SAS Nagar. Those details belong to the later record unless its text shows a direct connection.

A sector name or road destination does not define a parcel boundary. The supplied information includes no khasra list or map for the December notice, so it cannot identify an individual site or a defined stretch of land. This distinction matters when comparing a notice with a plot, revenue record, or other land document.

Ad — Mid-Article — In-Article Native (publisher ID not set)

What the sequence of notices does, and does not, show

The available information identifies a December 2024 public notice associated with Sector 74, SAS Nagar, and National Highway 21, followed by a February 2025 notice titled around missing khasra numbers for the 200-wide PR-7 road between Sector 74 and Kharar National Highway 21. The later item establishes that another site-tracked notice concerned this named corridor.

The titles do not establish a procedural chain. They do not confirm that the February notice amended, completed, or advanced the December notice, or that the two concern the same land parcels or legal process. The available information does not establish a history of a proposal, notification, hearing, award, or completed road works.

This chronology contains two identified records, not confirmed project milestones. The December record is associated with Sector 74 and National Highway 21. The February record is titled around acquisition of missing khasra numbers for the PR-7 corridor. Its title cannot establish the contents, outcome, or status of the earlier notice.

Overlapping place names alone do not show that notices are successive steps in one process. Comparing the notice text for notification references, parcel identifiers, authority details, and stated purpose can help readers assess whether the records are connected. The supplied information does not provide those linking details.

Why the distinction matters to landholders and readers

Sector 74 and the PR-7 corridor appear in the titles of separate notices. Their relationship matters to people checking land or road matters in this part of SAS Nagar, but shared references to Sector 74 and National Highway 21 do not show that the notices have the same purpose or affect the same properties.

For a plot owner, landholder, or prospective buyer, the relevant details are the stated action, parcel identifiers, boundaries, and any named process or authority. The information supplied for the December notice includes none of these particulars. Its project rationale and current procedural status are also unconfirmed, so the title alone cannot support a conclusion about acquisition or development impact.

The later PR-7 reference is a useful research lead because it names a corridor from Sector 74 to Kharar National Highway 21. It does not establish that the December notice forms part of a road scheme, that the alignment includes a particular property, or that an acquisition step has been completed. The documented facts support comparing the records, not deciding their legal relationship.

The December notice’s exact wording is essential to understanding its scope. The supplied information does not establish whether it is informational, identifies land, requests or requires a response, or records an administrative action.

Related record and information gaps

A later item tracked on this site is titled Acquisition of missing khasra numbers for the 200-wide PR-7 road from Sector 74 to Kharar National Highway 21. Its title describes the corridor and refers to missing khasra numbers, but the available information does not establish its procedural relationship to the notice on this page.

The supplied page information does not include the December notice’s notification number, named contact authority, affected parcel details, or stated next step. These details cannot be established without the notice text. Anyone checking whether a particular property is covered needs to consult the notice itself, rather than rely on its title or the later corridor notice.

When comparing the records, check whether they name the same authority or notification reference, list the same villages or khasra numbers, or expressly refer to one another. The supplied information confirms none of these links. Until the text provides that evidence, the February 2025 notice is a separate, later record concerning the named PR-7 corridor, not an explanation of the December notice.

Ad — End of Article — In-Article Native (publisher ID not set)
Where this comes from: This is a summary of a notice published by GMADA. The original document lives on GMADA's own website — gmada.gov.in — use the download button above to view or save it.
Ad — Above Footer — Leaderboard 728×90 (publisher ID not set)