Public notice regarding form no 3574 Size 100SY Date 25.01.2018 Oustee Scheme SAS Nagar.

What the notice identifies

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) issued a public notice concerning allotment of: Plot No. 463, Sector 66-Beta, S.A.S. Nagar The plot measures: 100 square yards and had been earmarked against: Form No. 3574 dated 25 January 2018 under the ST Scheme / ST quota mentioned in the notice. The notice was issued because of a discrepancy in the name recorded on the receipt for the earnest-money deposit.

Who Had Applied for the Plot?

According to the notice, the application was submitted by two landowners: Davinder Kumar and Surinder Kumar both sons of Gursharan Das, residents of Village Manauli, S.A.S. Nagar district. They had applied for a 100 sq. yd. plot under the scheme using certificates issued against land acquired under: Award No. 527

Land and Certificates Mentioned

The notice records that each applicant had acquired land measuring approximately: 1 Bigha 6.26 Biswas The supporting ST certificates mentioned are: For Davinder Kumar: Certificate No. 858 dated 19 February 2014 For Surinder Kumar: Certificate No. 839 dated 19 February 2014 Photocopies of these certificates had been attached with the application.

Earnest Money Deposited

The applicants had also deposited: ₹1,00,000 as earnest money. The notice refers to: Receipt No. 64139 dated 25 January 2018 and a Demand Draft associated with: HDFC Bank The DD number appears in the clearer copy as approximately: 012880 dated 25 January 2018

What Was the Problem?

The main issue was that the earnest-money receipt did not carry the names of the actual applicants. Instead, the receipt recorded the applicant as: Davinder Singh, son of Gurman Singh whereas the application related to: Davinder Kumar and Surinder Kumar, sons of Gursharan Das

What Did the Applicants Tell GMADA?

According to the notice, Davinder Kumar and Surinder Kumar personally informed the authority that:

• the ₹1,00,000 earnest money had actually been deposited by them; and
• the incorrect name appearing on the receipt was the result of a clerical error in the office.

They therefore requested GMADA to proceed with allotment of the plot earmarked against their application.

Which Plot Was Earmarked?

The notice identifies the earmarked property as: Plot No. 463 located in: Sector 66-Beta, S.A.S. Nagar against: Form No. 3574

Why Was a Public Notice Issued?

Before taking further action on the allotment, GMADA invited objections from any person who might have a claim or objection relating to the case. The public notice therefore acts as a safeguard before the allotment is formally processed.

Objection Period

Any person having an objection was required to submit it within: 15 days from the date of publication of the notice The objection had to be submitted to the office of the concerned GMADA authority.

What Happens After 15 Days?

The notice states that objections received after the prescribed period would not be considered. If no valid objection was received within the 15-day period, GMADA proposed to proceed with action for issuing allotment of: Plot No. 463, Sector 66-Beta against: Form No. 3574

Does This Notice Mean the Plot Was Already Finally Allotted?

No. The notice should not be interpreted as a final allotment order. At this stage:

• the plot had been earmarked;
• the applicants had requested issuance of allotment;
• a clerical discrepancy had been identified; and
• GMADA was inviting objections before taking further action.

A later allotment letter or estate-office record would be required to confirm that the plot was finally allotted.

What Is the Main Issue in Simple Terms?

Two landowners had applied for a 100 sq. yd. plot under the ST Scheme and deposited ₹1 lakh as earnest money. However, the payment receipt contained the wrong applicant name. The applicants told GMADA that this was only an office clerical error and that the payment had actually been made by them. Because Plot No. 463, Sector 66-Beta had been earmarked against their application, GMADA issued this public notice giving anyone with an objection: 15 days to come forward before the allotment process was taken further.

Important Records Mentioned

The notice refers to:

• Form No. 3574
• Date: 25 January 2018
• Plot size: 100 sq. yd.
• Award No. 527
• Certificate No. 858 dated 19 February 2014
• Certificate No. 839 dated 19 February 2014
• Receipt No. 64139 dated 25 January 2018
• Earnest Money: ₹1,00,000
• Earmarked Plot: Plot No. 463, Sector 66-Beta, S.A.S. Nagar

SAS Nagar is the limit of the location detail available

The title identifies SAS Nagar but does not name a village, sector, locality, plot location, or development site. The supplied information therefore does not locate the form more precisely or connect it to a particular road or landmark.

The broad area name does not establish where a beneficiary’s plot or related land is situated. The research information available for this page does not confirm a more specific location, so readers cannot use the title alone to assess the plot’s position or its relationship to surrounding infrastructure or planning areas.

The form’s place in the Oustee Scheme record is not established

The title names the Oustee Scheme, but the supplied information does not describe its rules, the circumstances in which this form was issued, or the history of form no. 3574. It does not establish whether the form relates to an application, allotment, possession, eligibility, or another stage. The 2018 date alone does not show that any of these events occurred then.

The page’s publication date is 14 January 2025, separate from the 25 January 2018 date in the title. Neither date, on the facts supplied, establishes a particular administrative action or a sequence of steps for this form.

Other tracked notices do not establish the history of form no. 3574. A May 2025 notice concerns form no. 4560 in the 750 IT City SAS Nagar scheme, while a February 2026 notice concerns form no. 112408 in the Eco City-1 SAS Nagar Scheme. September 2026 Aerotropolis E, F, G, H, I and J land-pooling plot-size corrigenda and a February 2026 Eco City 3 land-pooling form update are also listed, but the supplied information does not connect any of these items to form no. 3574.

The other records have different form numbers, scheme names, or land-pooling subjects. Their presence in the related-notices list is not evidence of a shared administrative history or a documented sequence for this Oustee Scheme entry.

What the identifiers establish, and what remains unconfirmed

The form number and stated plot size are identifiers in the title. They distinguish this item from notices titled for forms 4560 and 112408, but do not identify the form holder, locate the plot, explain the reason for publication, or confirm a decision concerning the form.

The available facts do not show how this notice fits into a wider development project or establish that it marks a current scheme milestone. No connection to Aerotropolis, IT City, Eco City, or a particular village is documented. The title does not establish whether the stated 100-square-yard size describes an allotted plot, an application category, or something else.

To understand the notice’s practical effect or its place in an administrative sequence, readers need details from the notice itself or another record specifically tied to form no. 3574.

What to verify in the PDF

The title and page metadata do not establish what the form holder should do. Check the PDF for an addressee, property or plot description, reason for publication, requested action, deadline, and any named office or response method. These particulars are not confirmed by the supplied information, so this page does not state a procedure or contact point.

Read 25.01.2018 in the context given by the document. It should not be assumed to be the publication date or a deadline. The page record gives a separate publication date of 14 January 2025, but the available information does not identify what event the title date marks.

The related notices listed for other forms and schemes do not document a next step for form no. 3574. Until the PDF or a record expressly tied to this form confirms the relevant details, no action or deadline can be attributed to the form holder.