Public notice regarding colony name Aman city Roopnagar.

Overview

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) has issued a public notice concerning: M/s LALA Builder & Land Promoter The promoter had been granted: Colony Licence No. LDC-16/2014 for development of a colony named: Aman City at: Roopnagar (H.N. No. 44) The licence was subject to terms and conditions that the promoter was required to comply with.

Why Has GMADA Issued This Notice?

Under the terms of the colony licence, the promoter was required to deposit statutory charges with the competent authority, including:

• External Development Charges (EDC)
• Licence Fee
• other applicable statutory charges

According to GMADA, the promoter failed to deposit the required dues.

Amount Outstanding

The notice states that the promoter had become a defaulter of approximately: ₹85.00 lakh on account of: External Development Charges The notice says that various notices had already been issued asking the promoter to clear the outstanding dues, but no payment had been made up to the date of the public notice.

What Action Has Already Been Taken?

GMADA clearly states that: registration of sale deeds in the colony has already been stopped. This is the most definite enforcement action confirmed by the notice.

What Other Action Has Been Requested?

The notice states that the concerned offices had also been requested to initiate further action against the promoter, including:

• cancellation of the project's RERA registration;
• withdrawal of the layout plan;
• suspension or cancellation of the colony licence; and
• stopping all building approvals for the project by GMADA.

These measures should not automatically be treated as already completed unless supported by a separate final order.

Has the RERA Registration Already Been Cancelled?

The notice does not confirm final cancellation of the RERA registration. It states that the concerned authority had been requested to initiate such action. Therefore, the safer wording is: “Action for cancellation of the project's RERA registration was requested.” A separate RERA order would be required to confirm actual cancellation.

Has Colony Licence No. LDC-16/2014 Been Cancelled?

Not on the basis of this notice alone. The notice says action for: suspension/cancellation of the licence had been requested. It does not state that the licence had already been finally cancelled.

What Is GMADA Advising the Public?

GMADA has advised the general public not to enter into any sale or purchase transaction with: M/s LALA Builder & Land Promoter in relation to:

• plots;
• apartments; or
• any other properties in the project.

What If Someone Still Proceeds With a Transaction?

The notice states that any person who still enters into such a transaction will do so: entirely at their own risk and cost. This makes the notice a significant buyer-warning and due-diligence alert.

Does This Mean Aman City Is an Illegal Colony?

The notice does not describe Aman City as an unauthorised or illegal colony. It states that the promoter had been granted: Colony Licence No. LDC-16/2014 The problem identified in this notice is the promoter's subsequent default in payment of statutory charges and non-compliance with licence conditions.

What Should Buyers and Existing Allottees Check?

Anyone connected with Aman City should verify:

• Colony Licence No. LDC-16/2014
• current status of the colony licence
• current RERA registration status
• layout plan status
• whether sale-deed registration remains stopped
• outstanding EDC and other statutory dues
• individual plot/apartment approvals
• title and ownership documents
• sanctioned building plans
• any mortgage or encumbrance
• any subsequent GMADA order
• any RERA authority order
• any later notice withdrawing or modifying this warning

What to verify in the notice

The supplied page information does not identify Aman City’s precise location, village, tehsil, district, developer, or any application or approval reference. It also provides no response period, submission method, or other instructions for people affected by the notice. These details cannot be inferred from the colony name or page title.

The linked PDF is hosted by GMADA, but its substantive text is not included in the information supplied for this companion page. The PDF is needed to establish what the notice says about Aman City and whether it specifies an action, deadline, contact point, or process. Until those details are verified in the document or another reliable record, this page cannot identify a required response or the notice’s effect on a property or application.

When checking the PDF, look for identifying details and instructions stated in the document. A location or application reference may help establish whether the notice concerns a particular colony or property. Any response period, submission method, authority, or contact point should come from the notice itself, not be inferred from the title.

The page describes the linked file as an English-language PDF hosted by GMADA. That description does not reveal the document’s contents or establish that the notice is an invitation to respond, a decision, or a step in an approval process.

No verified development timeline for Aman City

The available information does not connect Aman City to a documented sequence of planning or development events. It does not establish that the colony was proposed, notified, approved, revised, or included in a particular GMADA scheme, and it does not document a land-use history for the named place.

Other notices supplied for context concern different locations or schemes. They establish no link to Aman City or Roopnagar and cannot support an inferred project timeline, administrative decision, or development status. A reliable account would require records that specifically identify Aman City or a confirmed matching location.

The supplied records do not establish a sequence of proposal, notification, hearing, award, or approval for Aman City. Evidence of one stage would not, on its own, establish a later stage. The materials available here do not provide a named Aman City record from which to build a timeline.

Information about development elsewhere does not establish this colony’s history or status. The supplied material does not document Aman City’s past or present development status.

The location is not established by the title

The title associates Aman City with “Roopnagar,” but the supplied information does not identify the colony’s village, tehsil, district, or precise position. It does not establish that Aman City is in a particular part of Greater Mohali or describe its relationship to Mohali, SAS Nagar, Chandigarh, New Chandigarh, a road, or another named locality.

A place name alone does not establish the relevant administrative area or the land covered by a notice. To determine whether a property or locality is involved, readers need to check the location and identifying references in the PDF. Until then, no specific geographic or jurisdictional claim about Aman City is supported.

The supplied facts do not show whether “Roopnagar” denotes an administrative district, a locality, or another designation. They also do not confirm that Aman City lies within Greater Mohali or provide a basis for claims about nearby roads, sectors, landmarks, or distances.

For readers checking a property or local connection, useful identifiers may include the exact village or locality name and any plot, application, or other reference printed in the notice. These details can help establish the notice’s geographic scope. The page information does not supply them, so the location remains unresolved.

The notice’s planning significance remains unconfirmed

GMADA says that M/s LALA Builder & Land Promoter was licensed to develop Aman City at Roopnagar. The promoter was required to pay statutory charges such as EDC and licence-related dues. According to GMADA, approximately: ₹85 lakh remained unpaid despite repeated notices. Because of this:

• sale-deed registration in the colony had already been stopped; and
• further action had been requested, including possible cancellation of RERA registration, withdrawal of the layout plan, suspension/cancellation of the colony licence and stopping building approvals.

GMADA therefore advised the public not to buy or sell plots, apartments or other properties with this promoter. Anyone proceeding with a transaction would do so at their own risk and cost.