Public notice regarding General Public is hereby intimated that approvals for thr mega project name M/s H.P Singh and others located in 39 west sector 122 SAS Nagar.

What the notice identifies

The Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) issued a public notice concerning the mega project: 39 West, Sector 122, S.A.S. Nagar The notice identifies the project in connection with: M/s H.P. Singh and Others According to GMADA, the approvals granted for the project had been cancelled earlier because of violations of the conditions attached to those approvals.

When Were the Project Approvals Cancelled?

The notice states that GMADA cancelled the project approvals on: 18 December 2023 The stated reason was: violation of the conditions of the approvals

What Happened After the Approvals Were Cancelled?

According to the notice, the promoter left development works incomplete. As a result, residents and allottees of the project were facing difficulties because required:

• services; and
• amenities

had not been completed. The notice does not provide a detailed list of the unfinished works or amenities.

Why Did GMADA Call a Public Hearing?

GMADA called residents and allottees so that their grievances concerning the project could be formally recorded. The stated purpose was to:

• hear the problems being faced by residents and allottees;
• list grievances relating to the project; and
• initiate further action for addressing those grievances in accordance with the applicable rules.

Hearing Date

The hearing was scheduled for: 10 February 2025

Time

11:30 AM

Venue

Community Centre Purab Premium Apartments Sector 88, S.A.S. Nagar

Who Could Attend?

The notice asked: residents and allottees of the project to attend. They could appear:

• personally; or
• through a person authorised to represent them.

What Was the Purpose of Representation?

Residents and allottees were asked to place their grievances relating to the project before GMADA. The hearing was intended to help the authority understand issues arising from:

• incomplete development works;
• incomplete services;
• incomplete amenities; and
• other project-related difficulties being faced by residents/allottees.

Does This Notice Mean the Entire Project Was Legally Cancelled?

The clearer English notice specifically says: “approvals for the Mega Project ... were cancelled by GMADA” Therefore, the safest wording is that the project approvals were cancelled. The notice should not be expanded to mean that every allotment, ownership right or transaction within the project automatically stood cancelled. Those issues would depend on separate legal and regulatory records.

Does This Notice Restore the Project Approvals?

No. The public hearing was meant to collect grievances and begin a process for addressing them under the applicable rules. The notice does not state that:

• the cancelled approvals were restored;
• the promoter received fresh approval;
• development work had resumed;
• amenities had been completed; or
• the project had been regularised.

Any such later development would require a separate GMADA order or official record.

Does This Notice Order GMADA to Complete the Project?

No. The notice only states that residents' and allottees' grievances would be heard so that a process could be initiated for resolving them under the rules. It does not specify:

• who would complete the remaining works;
• how the works would be funded;
• a completion deadline; or
• any final remedial decision.

What Should Residents and Buyers Check?

Anyone researching the status of 39 West should verify:

• original project approvals;
• GMADA cancellation order dated 18 December 2023;
• reasons and conditions cited in the cancellation order;
• approved layout and development obligations;
• services and amenities originally required;
• RERA status, if applicable;
• any later court or authority proceedings;
• action taken after the 10 February 2025 grievance hearing;
• any revised approval or restoration order; and
• current development status.

What the location description establishes

SAS Nagar is a district name commonly used for Mohali. The supplied information does not establish the project site’s exact location within the district, or its relationship to a specific landmark. The title does not provide a verified village, revenue area, site plan, or boundary description.

Reading the sector wording

The wording “39 west sector 122 SAS Nagar” does not establish whether “39 west” refers to a locality, a project component, or another designation used in the notice. It also does not confirm that the site falls within a specific sector boundary. Without a map, parcel identifiers, or a clear revenue-area reference, treat this as the title’s location description rather than a verified site address.

The supplied information does not link the site to a particular road, landmark, neighboring sector, or village. A more precise account would require details from the notice or a site plan it identifies.

Project history and development status

The supplied information does not document a project-specific timeline for M/s H.P. Singh and others. It does not confirm an earlier application, a sequence of approvals, a modification, or physical progress. The title indicates that the notice concerns approvals, but the available details do not establish the project’s current status or whether any work has been completed.

Other notices listed on the site concern separate named matters, including Tangori, Togan and Teera, Sector 66-A Mohali, and IT City. Their titles do not connect those matters to M/s H.P. Singh and others or establish this project’s history. The supplied information supports no chronology beyond the existence of this public intimation.

Applications, approvals, modifications, and implementation are distinct stages. The supplied information does not identify which stage this notice represents or document a sequence of events for this project.

Why the approval details matter

The notice concerns approvals for a named project in SAS Nagar, but its title does not say what those approvals authorize. Without the approval type, conditions, or site boundaries, the scope of the approvals and the land they concern remain unclear. The supplied facts do not establish a connection to a named master-plan sector or a broader project such as IT City.

A reference to approvals is not enough to establish their scope. The title does not specify the project’s approved use or scale, whether the approvals are conditional, or whether the project is operational. These details need to be checked in the notice and any documents it identifies, rather than inferred from the phrase “mega project.”

The supplied title does not identify the project’s precise location or the scope of the approvals. Read the notice as an intimation concerning approvals, not as evidence of a completed project, a particular land-use outcome, or a defined change to the surrounding area.

What to verify in the notice

• Notice Date: February 10, 2025

For more information and complete details, click on “Open Original Document” to view the official source.